|
''Georgia v. Brailsford'', , was a United States Supreme Court case continuing the case of Georgia v. Brailsford (1792). Here, the court held that "upon a motion to dissolve that injunction, this court held that, if the state of Georgia had the title in the debt, (upon which no opinion was then expressed,) she had an adequate remedy at law by action upon the bond; but, in order that the money might be kept for the party to whom it belonged, ordered the injunction to be continued till the next term, and, if Georgia should not then have instituted her action at common law, to be dissolved."〔''The Supreme Court Reporter'' by Robert Desty, United States. Supreme Court, West Publishing Company'' Published by West Pub. Co., 1888 Item notes: v. 8, pg. 1376〕〔''The Constitution of the United States: With Notes of the Decisions of the Supreme Court Thereon, from the Organization of the Court Till October, 1900'' By Edwin Eustace Bryant, United States Published by The Democrat Printing Company, 1901, pg. 230()〕 〔James R. Perry, ''The Documentary History of the Supreme Court of the United States, 1789-1800'', Volume 6, "West v. Barnes," p. 73. ()〕〔(2 U.S. 402 (1793) )〕 ==See also== * Georgia v. Brailsford (disambiguation) * Georgia v. Brailsford (1794) * List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 2 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Georgia v. Brailsford (1793)」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|